Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA L40 CNX vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

NVIDIA L40 CNX vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM L40 CNX and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA L40 CNX 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2475MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
17984 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
L40 CNX +19374%
89.97 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Nov 2008
Tesla Ada
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1005 MHz
Base Clock
-
2475 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
864.0GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
142
SM Count
24
18176
Shading Units
192
568
TMUs
64
192
ROPs
24
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

475.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
1406 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
89.97 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
89.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
1406 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
150W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
GT200B
AD102-???-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4 nm
Process Size
55 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
608 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy