Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA L40 CNX vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE

NVIDIA L40 CNX vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM L40 CNX and 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000 SE to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA L40 CNX 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 168% (2475MHz vs 924MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
17152 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
L40 CNX +4655%
89.97 TFLOPS
Quadro M3000 SE
1.892 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Oct 2016
Tesla Ada
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1005 MHz
Base Clock
823 MHz
2475 MHz
Boost Clock
924 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
864.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
142
SM Count
-
18176
Shading Units
1024
568
TMUs
64
192
ROPs
32
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

475.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.57 GPixel/s
1406 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.14 GTexel/s
89.97 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
89.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.892 TFLOPS
1406 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.14 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
75W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
GM204
AD102-???-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4 nm
Process Size
28 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
608 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
5.2
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy