Home GPU Comparison ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 vs AMD Radeon E9550 MXM

ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 vs AMD Radeon E9550 MXM

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Mobility FireGL V5700 and 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1266MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
2184 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Mobility FireGL V5700
0.144 TFLOPS
Radeon E9550 MXM +3951%
5.834 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Sep 2016
Mobility FireGL
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1120 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1266 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
2304
8
TMUs
144
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.51 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
182.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.834 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.834 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
364.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
95W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

M86
GPU Name
Ellesmere
M86-M GL (216-0683008)
GPU Variant
Ellesmere XT
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.378 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
135 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy