Home GPU Comparison ATI Mobility FireGL V5725 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX150

ATI Mobility FireGL V5725 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX150

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Mobility FireGL V5725 and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX150 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1532MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.06GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
264 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Mobility FireGL V5725
0.163 TFLOPS
GeForce MX150 +622%
1.177 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
May 2017
Mobility FireGL
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1469 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1532 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
3
120
Shading Units
384
8
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.720 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.51 GPixel/s
5.440 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.77 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.38 GFLOPS
163.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1177 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
36.77 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
25W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

M86
GPU Name
GP108
M86-ME XT GL (216-0683010)
GPU Variant
GP108-650-A1 (N17S-G1-A1)
TeraScale
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.378 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
135 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy