Home GPU Comparison ATI Mobility FireGL V5725 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

ATI Mobility FireGL V5725 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Mobility FireGL V5725 and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock1038MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.06GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
264 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Mobility FireGL V5725
0.163 TFLOPS
GeForce MX250 +388%
0.797 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Unknown
Mobility FireGL
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
937 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
3
120
Shading Units
384
8
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.720 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.61 GPixel/s
5.440 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.91 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.46 GFLOPS
163.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
797.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
24.91 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
10W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

M86
GPU Name
GP108B
M86-ME XT GL (216-0683010)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.378 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
135 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy