Home GPU Comparison ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT Mac Edition and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9650M GS to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
8 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.60GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT Mac Edition
0.052 TFLOPS
GeForce 9650M GS +53%
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Mar 2008
M7x
Generation
GeForce 9M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
40
Shading Units
32
4
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
2.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
52.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
29W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

M74
GPU Name
G84
M74-M (216RMAKA12FG)
GPU Variant
NB9P-GS1-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy