Home GPU Comparison ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT Mac Edition and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
24 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT Mac Edition
0.052 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 160M +269%
0.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Mar 2009
M7x
Generation
GeForce 100M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
8
40
Shading Units
64
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
2.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
52.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
60W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

M74
GPU Name
G94
M74-M (216RMAKA12FG)
GPU Variant
N10E-GS1
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy