Home GPU Comparison ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 24.00GB/s)
2952 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
0.163 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +7476%
12.35 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Mar 2023
M7x
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
750 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
24.00GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
120
Shading Units
3072
8
TMUs
96
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.720 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
5.440 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
163.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

M76
GPU Name
AD107
M76 XT-M (216XJBKA13FG)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy