Home GPU Comparison ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Mobility Radeon HD 3650 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650 's Advantages
56 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Mobility Radeon HD 3650
0.12 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 160M +60%
0.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Mar 2009
M8x
Generation
GeForce 100M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
8
3
Compute Units
-
120
Shading Units
64
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
120.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

M86
GPU Name
G94
M86-ME (216-0683013)
GPU Variant
N10E-GS1
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.378 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
135 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
60W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy