Home GPU Comparison ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3850 vs AMD FirePro M8900

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3850 vs AMD FirePro M8900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Mobility Radeon HD 3850 and 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3850 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)
AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Mobility Radeon HD 3850
0.371 TFLOPS
FirePro M8900 +252%
1.306 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Apr 2011
M8x
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
4
Compute Units
12
320
Shading Units
960
16
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

9.280 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.76 GPixel/s
9.280 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.64 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
371.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1306 GFLOPS
74.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

M88
GPU Name
Blackcomb
-
GPU Variant
Blackcomb XT GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
1.7 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy