Home GPU Comparison ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce 825M

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce 825M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Mobility Radeon HD 4670 Mac Edition and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 825M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.28GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
NVIDIA GeForce 825M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock941MHz
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (33W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Mobility Radeon HD 4670 Mac Edition
0.435 TFLOPS
GeForce 825M +66%
0.723 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2009
Release Date
Jan 2014
M9x
Generation
GeForce 800M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
850 MHz
-
Boost Clock
941 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.440 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.528 GPixel/s
21.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.11 GTexel/s
-
-
-
435.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
722.7 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
30.11 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
33W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

M96
GPU Name
GK208
M96 XT (216-0729051)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.514 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy