Home GPU Comparison ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q

ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Mobility Radeon X1600 Mac Edition and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1605MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 12.67GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Jan 2023
M5x
Generation
GeForce 40 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1605 MHz
396 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
12.67GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
-
Shading Units
2560
4
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.592 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.04 GPixel/s
1.592 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.218 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
8.218 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
128.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
35W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

M56
GPU Name
AD107
-
GPU Variant
GN21-X2
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
Unknown
150 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
3.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy