Home GPU Comparison ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Mobility Radeon X1600 Mac Edition and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 12.67GB/s)
9728 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Jan 2023
M5x
Generation
GeForce 40 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1335 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
396 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.67GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
76
-
Shading Units
9728
4
TMUs
304
4
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.592 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
189.8 GPixel/s
1.592 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
515.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.98 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
32.98 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
515.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
80-150W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

M56
GPU Name
AD103
-
GPU Variant
GN21-X11
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
3.0
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy