Home GPU Comparison ATI Mobility Radeon X2300 vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

ATI Mobility Radeon X2300 vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 64MB VRAM Mobility Radeon X2300 and 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 16 years late
Boost Clock2115MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 64GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 6.272GB/s)
9728 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2007
Release Date
Mar 2023
M6x
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1425 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2115 MHz
392 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

64MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.272GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
76
-
Shading Units
9728
4
TMUs
304
4
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.916 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
236.9 GPixel/s
1.916 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
643.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
41.15 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
41.15 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
643.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
120W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

M64
GPU Name
AD103
M64-M (216PVAVA12FG)
GPU Variant
-
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.105 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
3.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy