Home GPU Comparison ATI Mobility Radeon X2500 vs NVIDIA GeForce 920M

ATI Mobility Radeon X2500 vs NVIDIA GeForce 920M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Mobility Radeon X2500 and 2GB VRAM GeForce 920M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 920M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.40GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Mar 2015
M6x
Generation
GeForce 900M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
-
Shading Units
384
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.840 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
1.840 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

M66
GPU Name
GK208B
-
GPU Variant
N16V-GM
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
33W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
3.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy