Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S1000M vs NVIDIA H200 NVL

Moore Threads MTT S1000M vs NVIDIA H200 NVL

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M and 141GB VRAM H200 NVL to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 600W)
NVIDIA H200 NVL 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (141GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4.89TB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
15872 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
2.048 TFLOPS
H200 NVL +2845%
60.32 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jul 2022
Release Date
Nov 2024
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Server Hopper
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1365 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1593 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
141GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM3e
128bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
4.89TB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
132
1024
Shading Units
16896
64
TMUs
528
64
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
50 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.84 GPixel/s
64.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
942.5 GTexel/s
4.096 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
241.3 TFLOPS
2.048 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
60.32 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.16 TFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
600W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
GH100
-
-
-
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Hopper
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
Unknown
Transistors
80 billion
Unknown
Die Size
814 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
9.0
6.5
Shader Model
N/A
© 2025 - TopCPU.net