Moore Threads MTT S1000M vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M and 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 250W)
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2550MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
11776 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
2.048 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+3087%
65.28 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2022
Release Date
Aug 2023
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1155 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2550 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
100
1024
Shading Units
12800
64
TMUs
400
64
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
400
-
RT Cores
100
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
72 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
448.8 GPixel/s
64.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1020 GTexel/s
4.096 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
65.28 TFLOPS
2.048 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
65.28 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1020 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
AD102
-
GPU Variant
AD102
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
Unknown
Transistors
76.3 billion
Unknown
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5
Shader Model
6.7
