Moore Threads MTT S1000M vs AMD Radeon R9 280X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (35W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 280X 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
2.048 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280X
+100%
4.096 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2022
Release Date
Oct 2013
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
850 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
2048
64
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
64.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
4.096 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.048 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti XTL
(215-0821065)
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
4.313 billion
Unknown
Die Size
352 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.4
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1
