Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S1000M vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

Moore Threads MTT S1000M vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S1000M and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S1000M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S1000M
2.048 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY X +320%
8.602 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jul 2022
Release Date
Jun 2015
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
4096
64
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
67.20 GPixel/s
64.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
268.8 GTexel/s
4.096 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.602 TFLOPS
2.048 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.602 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
537.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
275W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Fiji
-
GPU Variant
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
8.9 billion
Unknown
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.3
© 2025 - TopCPU.net