Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs NVIDIA CMP 90HX

Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs NVIDIA CMP 90HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 10GB VRAM CMP 90HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 10GB)
Lower TDP (150W vs 320W)
NVIDIA CMP 90HX 's Advantages
Boost Clock1710MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (760.3GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
10.65 TFLOPS
CMP 90HX +105%
21.89 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jul 2021
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1300 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1710 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1188 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
10GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6X
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
760.3GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
50
4096
Shading Units
6400
256
TMUs
200
256
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
200
-
RT Cores
50
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
5 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
136.8 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
342.0 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
21.89 TFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
21.89 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
342.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
320W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
GA102
-
GPU Variant
GA102-100-A1
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
12 nm
Process Size
8 nm
Unknown
Transistors
28.3 billion
Unknown
Die Size
628 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.5
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net