Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
4056 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000 +33181%
10.65 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2009
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1300 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
40
256
TMUs
4
256
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
32W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
RV620
-
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.181 billion
Unknown
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
4.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net