Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 24.00GB/s)
4000 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+4337%
10.65 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 230 OEM
0.24 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Apr 2009
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
24.00GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
12
4096
Shading Units
96
256
TMUs
48
256
ROPs
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
48 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.000 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
G92B
-
GPU Variant
G92-159-B1
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.754 billion
Unknown
Die Size
260 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.5
Shader Model
4.0
