Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 216.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 's Advantages
Boost Clock2640MHz
Lower TDP (115W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
10.65 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4050
+26%
13.52 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Unknown
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
2505 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2640 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
216.0GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
18
4096
Shading Units
2560
256
TMUs
80
256
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
120
-
RT Cores
18
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
84.48 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
211.2 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
13.52 TFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.52 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
211.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
115W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
AD107
-
-
-
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
Unknown
Transistors
18.9 billion
Unknown
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5
Shader Model
6.8
