Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 54.40GB/s)
4000 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+4043%
10.65 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 240
0.257 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2009
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
54.40GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
12
4096
Shading Units
96
256
TMUs
32
256
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
257.3 GFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
69W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x VGA
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
GT215
-
GPU Variant
GT215-450-A2
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.727 billion
Unknown
Die Size
144 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.5
Shader Model
4.1
