Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
3952 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (106W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+2261%
10.65 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3
0.451 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jul 2012
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
3
4096
Shading Units
144
256
TMUs
24
256
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.698 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.79 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
451.0 GFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.58 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
106W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
GF116
-
GPU Variant
GF116-200-KA-A1
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.17 billion
Unknown
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.5
Shader Model
5.1
