Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (150W vs 160W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 's Advantages
Boost Clock2535MHz
256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
10.65 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104
+107%
22.06 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Apr 2024
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
2310 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2535 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
34
4096
Shading Units
4352
256
TMUs
136
256
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
136
-
RT Cores
34
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
121.7 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
344.8 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
22.06 TFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.06 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
344.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
160W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
AD104
-
GPU Variant
AD104-150-K1-A1
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
Unknown
Transistors
35.8 billion
Unknown
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5
Shader Model
6.7
