Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs AMD Radeon RX 6300

Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs AMD Radeon RX 6300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 2GB VRAM Radeon RX 6300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon RX 6300 's Advantages
Boost Clock2040MHz
Lower TDP (32W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000 +239%
10.65 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6300
3.133 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Unknown
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1300 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
32bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
768
256
TMUs
48
256
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
32W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x HDMI 2.1
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Navi 24
-
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XL
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
Unknown
Transistors
5.4 billion
Unknown
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net