Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs NVIDIA P106 090

Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs NVIDIA P106 090

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 3GB VRAM P106 090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 192.2GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA P106 090 's Advantages
Boost Clock1531MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000 +352%
10.65 TFLOPS
P106 090
2.352 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jul 2017
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x1

Clock Speeds

1300 MHz
Base Clock
1354 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1531 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2002 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.2GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
4096
Shading Units
768
256
TMUs
48
256
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
73.49 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
73.49 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
36.74 GFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.352 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
73.49 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
GP106
-
GPU Variant
GP106-090-A1
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
16 nm
Unknown
Transistors
4.4 billion
Unknown
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.5
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net