Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6600

Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro W6600 's Advantages
Boost Clock2580MHz
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000 +15%
10.65 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6600
9.247 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2021
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1300 MHz
Base Clock
2331 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2580 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
1792
256
TMUs
112
256
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
28
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB

Theoretical Performance

332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
165.1 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
289.0 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
18.49 TFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.247 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
577.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Navi 23
-
-
-
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
7 nm
Unknown
Transistors
11.06 billion
Unknown
Die Size
237 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net