Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6900X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Boost Clock2150MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
10.65 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6900X
+106%
22.02 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2021
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
1825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2150 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
80
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
5120
256
TMUs
320
256
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
80
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
275.2 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
688.0 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
44.03 TFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.02 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1376 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
4x Thunderbolt
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Navi 21
-
GPU Variant
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
7 nm
Unknown
Transistors
26.8 billion
Unknown
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.5
