Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs Intel Arc Pro A40

Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs Intel Arc Pro A40

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A40 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc Pro A40 's Advantages
Boost Clock1700MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000 +205%
10.65 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A40
3.482 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2022
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1300 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
1024
256
TMUs
64
256
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.40 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.8 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.963 TFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.482 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
870.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
Unknown
Transistors
7.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net