Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 16GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 190W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7700 's Advantages
Boost Clock2600MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
10.65 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7700
+200%
31.95 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2023
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
1900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2600 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
48
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
3072
256
TMUs
192
256
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
249.6 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
499.2 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
63.90 TFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.95 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
190W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Navi 32
-
GPU Variant
Navi 32
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
Unknown
Transistors
28.1 billion
Unknown
Die Size
346 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.7
