Moore Threads MTT S2000 vs AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 and 12GB VRAM Radeon RX 9070 GRE to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 432.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 220W)
AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE 's Advantages
Boost Clock2790MHz
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S2000
10.65 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 9070 GRE
+221%
34.28 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
May 2025
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Navi IV
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Base Clock
1420 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2790 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
48
-
SM Count
46
4096
Shading Units
3072
256
TMUs
192
256
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
L3 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
332.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
267.8 GPixel/s
332.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
535.7 GTexel/s
21.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
68.57 TFLOPS
10.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
34.28 TFLOPS
166.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1071.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
220W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1b
3x DisplayPort 2.1a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 1
GPU Name
Navi 48
-
GPU Variant
Navi 48 XL
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
4 nm
Unknown
Transistors
53.9 billion
Unknown
Die Size
357 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
12.0
6.5
Shader Model
6.8
