Moore Threads MTT S3000 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S3000 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S3000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock2130MHz
Lower TDP (70W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S3000
+29%
15.56 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
12 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Feb 2024
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1900 MHz
Base Clock
1620 MHz
0 MHz
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
4096
Shading Units
2816
256
TMUs
88
256
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
486.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
486.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
31.13 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
15.56 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
70W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
AD107
-
-
-
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
22 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
Unknown
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5
Shader Model
6.7
