Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
7976 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 450W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S4000
+4485%
24.58 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Sep 2008
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
448bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
8192
Shading Units
216
512
TMUs
72
512
ROPs
28
128
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
768.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
768.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
49.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
24.58 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Board Design
450W
TDP
182W
850 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
GT200
-
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
22 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
Unknown
Die Size
576 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.5
Shader Model
4.0
