Home GPU Comparison Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs AMD Radeon R7 240

Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs AMD Radeon R7 240

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
7872 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Boost Clock780MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 450W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S4000 +4825%
24.58 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Oct 2013
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
730 MHz
-
Boost Clock
780 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
320
512
TMUs
20
512
ROPs
8
128
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

768.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
768.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
49.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
24.58 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
499.2 GFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

450W
TDP
30W
850 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
Oland
-
GPU Variant
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
22 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
Unknown
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.4
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net