Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs ATI Radeon X1050 AGP
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 and 128MB VRAM Radeon X1050 AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 6.496GB/s)
8192 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X1050 AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (24W vs 450W)
Score
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2007
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Radeon R300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
203 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.496GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
-
512
TMUs
4
512
ROPs
4
128
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
768.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.000 GPixel/s
768.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.000 GTexel/s
49.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
24.58 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
384.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
450W
TDP
24W
850 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
RV360
-
-
-
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
130 nm
22 billion
Transistors
0.06 billion
Unknown
Die Size
76 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0 (9_0)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
-
