Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs AMD FireStream 9250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
7392 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 450W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S4000
+2358%
24.58 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2008
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
-
-
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
800
512
TMUs
40
512
ROPs
16
128
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
768.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
768.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
49.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
24.58 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
450W
TDP
150W
850 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
RV770
-
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
22 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
Unknown
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
4.1
