Moore Threads MTT S4000 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
5376 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock2130MHz
Lower TDP (70W vs 450W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Moore Threads MTT S4000
+104%
24.58 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
12 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Feb 2024
MUSA-Chunxiao
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
8192
Shading Units
2816
512
TMUs
88
512
ROPs
48
128
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
768.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
768.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
49.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
24.58 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
450W
TDP
70W
850 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
MTT Gen 2
GPU Name
AD107
-
-
-
MUSA-Chunxiao
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
22 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
Unknown
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5
Shader Model
6.7
