Home GPU Comparison MTT S50 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

MTT S50 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM MTT S50 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

MTT S50 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
1536 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock930MHz
Lower TDP (65W vs 85W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
MTT S50 +446%
5.2 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2023
Release Date
Dec 2013
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1200 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
0 MHz
Boost Clock
930 MHz
MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
512
TMUs
32
ROPs
16
Tensor Cores
-
RT Cores
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
0 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.76 GTexel/s
TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.2 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
952.3 GFLOPS
GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

85W
TDP
65W
W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.0 2x DisplayPort 1.4
Outputs
No outputs
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

SuDi
GPU Name
Cape Verde
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRX
MUSA
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.5 billion
Unknown
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

11
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
CUDA
-
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy