Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 2100M vs AMD FirePro M4150

NVIDIA NVS 2100M vs AMD FirePro M4150

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 2100M and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M4150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M4150 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
368 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 2100M
0.039 TFLOPS
FirePro M4150 +1307%
0.549 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2010
Release Date
Oct 2013
NVS Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
384
8
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.140 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.720 GPixel/s
4.280 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.16 GTexel/s
-
-
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
549.1 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
34.32 GFLOPS

Board Design

11W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Opal
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy