Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 2100M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

NVIDIA NVS 2100M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 2100M and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 765M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 2100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (11W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock863MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.13GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 2100M
0.039 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 765M +3300%
1.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2010
Release Date
May 2013
NVS Mobile
Generation
GeForce 700M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
797 MHz
-
Boost Clock
863 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
64.13GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.140 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
13.81 GPixel/s
4.280 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.23 GTexel/s
-
-
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1326 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
55.23 GFLOPS

Board Design

11W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
GK106
-
GPU Variant
N14E-GE-B-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.2
CUDA
3.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy