Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 2100M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q

NVIDIA NVS 2100M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 2100M and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 2100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (11W vs 80W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
9712 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 2100M
0.039 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4090 Max Q +72489%
28.31 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2010
Release Date
Jan 2023
NVS Mobile
Generation
GeForce 40 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
76
16
Shading Units
9728
8
TMUs
304
4
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.140 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
163.0 GPixel/s
4.280 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
442.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.31 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
28.31 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
442.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

11W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
AD103
-
GPU Variant
GN21-X11
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
4 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy