Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 2100M vs ATI Radeon E4690 MXM

NVIDIA NVS 2100M vs ATI Radeon E4690 MXM

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 2100M and 512MB VRAM Radeon E4690 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 2100M 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Lower TDP (11W vs 30W)
ATI Radeon E4690 MXM 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (22.40GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 2100M
0.039 TFLOPS
Radeon E4690 MXM +884%
0.384 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2010
Release Date
Jun 2009
NVS Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
790 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
320
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.140 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
4.280 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

11W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
RV730
-
GPU Variant
RV730 XT E4690 (215-0729055)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy