Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 2100M vs AMD FirePro M5950

NVIDIA NVS 2100M vs AMD FirePro M5950

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 2100M and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M5950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 2100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (11W vs 35W)
AMD FirePro M5950 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.60GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
464 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 2100M
0.039 TFLOPS
FirePro M5950 +1684%
0.696 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2010
Release Date
Jan 2011
NVS Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
790 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
480
8
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.140 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.800 GPixel/s
4.280 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
696.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

11W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Whistler
-
GPU Variant
Whistler XT GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy