Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 2100M vs AMD Radeon R7 M260

NVIDIA NVS 2100M vs AMD Radeon R7 M260

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 2100M and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 M260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 M260 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock980MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.40GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
368 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 2100M
0.039 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 M260 +1828%
0.752 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2010
Release Date
Jun 2014
NVS Mobile
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
940 MHz
-
Boost Clock
980 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
384
8
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.140 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.840 GPixel/s
4.280 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.52 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
752.6 GFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
752.6 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
47.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

11W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Topaz
-
GPU Variant
Topaz XT (216-0858020)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
1.55 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
125 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy