Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 2100M vs NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation

NVIDIA NVS 2100M vs NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 2100M and 4GB VRAM RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 2100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (11W vs 35W)
NVIDIA RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2025MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
2032 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 2100M
0.039 TFLOPS
RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation +21166%
8.294 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2010
Release Date
Feb 2024
NVS Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1485 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2025 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
16
16
Shading Units
2048
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.140 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.80 GPixel/s
4.280 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.294 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.294 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
129.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

11W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
AD107
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy