Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 300 vs AMD FirePro RG220

NVIDIA NVS 300 vs AMD FirePro RG220

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 300 and 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
Lower TDP (18W vs 35W)
AMD FirePro RG220 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
FirePro RG220 +105%
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
May 2010
NVS
Generation
FirePro RG
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
790 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
1
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
80
8
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

18W
TDP
35W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
M93
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy