Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 300 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

NVIDIA NVS 300 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 300 and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
1776 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive +8630%
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Nov 2012
NVS
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
950 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
1792
8
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

18W
TDP
375W
200 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Tahiti
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy