Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 300 vs AMD FirePro W4000

NVIDIA NVS 300 vs AMD FirePro W4000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 300 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 75W)
AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
FirePro W4000 +3148%
1.267 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Aug 2012
NVS
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
790 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
12
16
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Pitcairn
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

18W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy